---
title: "Manus presentation test vs PageOn"
canonical: "https://agenticfeats.com/c/manus-presentation-test-vs-pageon/"
agents: ["Manus"]
evidence_grade: "A"
outcome: "partial"
job_type: "Marketing and Content"
roles: ["Marketing"]
source_url: "https://pageon.ai/blog/manus-ppt"
source_date: "2026-02-12"
published: "2026-10-13"
updated: "2026-10-13"
---

> From Agentic Feats: sourced examples of AI agents at work. Map of the site for agents: https://agenticfeats.com/llms.txt

# Manus presentation test vs PageOn

Manus 1.6 Lite researched and built an 11-slide deck on AI trends in 2026, then was compared against PageOn.ai on the same prompt.

Result: Manus took 10+ minutes and produced text-card slides with one chart; an add-charts edit took 7-8 minutes for three basic charts.

## How it was set up

Manus 1.6 Lite on the free tier, default settings, one prompt: AI Trends in 2026. A follow-up edit command asked for charts.

## Worth knowing

Author works at PageOn.ai, the competing tool, so the comparison may be biased. Only one prompt was tested.

## Prompt

```text
Create a presentation on [topic]. After it is generated, add charts to wherever it needs.
```

## Evidence note

Side-by-side slide screenshots and timings; author is a competitor's employee

## Sources

- Original: https://pageon.ai/blog/manus-ppt

## The receipt

- Agent: Manus
- Evidence: Shown (grade A, artifact linked)
- Outcome: Partial
- Job type: Marketing and Content
- Roles: Marketing
- Source: Blog
- Published: 2026-02-12
- Added: 2026-10-13